Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
9660
Download
1279
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2013) 12, 275 - 281

Research article
Movement Characteristics of Elite Tennis Players on Hard Courts with Respect to the Direction of Ground Strokes
Rafael Martínez-Gallego1, , José F.Guzmán1, Nic James2, Janez Pers3, Jesús Ramón-Llin1, Goran Vuckovic4
Author Information
1 University of Valencia, Spain;
2 University of Middlesex, London, England;
3 University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
4 University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Rafael Martínez-Gallego
✉ Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Valencia, Spain.
Email: ramargal@hotmail.com
Publish Date
Received: 31-08-2012
Accepted: 27-11-2012
Published (online): 01-06-2013
 
 
ABSTRACT

Previous studies of movement characteristics in tennis have considered the effect of playing surface but have assumed that playing strategies are simply determined by the surface as opposed to being under an individual’s control. This study considered the selection of cross court or down the line ground strokes as being indicative of playing strategy and measured the outcome of playing these shots in terms of the opponent’s movements. Matches (N = 8) at the 2011 ATP tournament 500 Valencia were recorded and analysed using SAGIT, a computer vision tracking system that allowed both players’ movements to be tracked automatically, albeit with operator supervision. The data was split into (N = 188) games for analysis purposes and these lasted a median 174.24 seconds with active time (ball in play) a median proportion of 34.89% (IQR = 10.64%) of total time. During the active time losers of games tended to cover less distance (median = 80.17 m), move quicker (median = 1.38 m·s-1), spend more time in the defensive zones (median = 14.24 s) and less in the offensive zones (median = 44.74 s). These results suggested that game winners tended to dominate game losers, forcing them to exhibit behaviors typically associated with a defensive strategy. Defensive and offensive strategy are not well defined currently and future investigations should consider movements in relation to individual shots, in particular their velocities, at the rally level and by different individuals to better understand successful performance.

Key words: Motion analysis, tactics, winners, losers, differences


           Key Points
  • During the active time losers of games covered less distance, moved quicker, spend more time in the defensive zones and less in the offensive zones.
  • These results suggested that game winners tended to dominate game losers, forcing them to exhibit behaviors typically associated with a defensive strategy.
  • There are no differences between the proportion of cross court shots and down the line shots played by game winners and game losers.
  • Future research should consider individual shots at the rally level to better understand successful performance and ultimately strategy.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2024 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.